Redefining the Role of Legal in Enterprise AI

Jan 26, 2025

ENTERPRISE

#legal

Explore how legal teams must evolve to navigate AI governance, compliance, and risk management, transforming from enforcers of regulation into strategic enablers of enterprise AI adoption.

Redefining the Role of Legal in Enterprise AI

As enterprises accelerate their adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), legal teams find themselves at a pivotal crossroads. The traditional responsibilities of legal departments—compliance, risk mitigation, and contract management—are being reshaped by AI’s ability to automate tasks, generate insights, and influence decision-making at scale.

However, AI introduces new challenges that extend beyond conventional legal frameworks. From regulatory compliance to intellectual property disputes, the legal function must evolve to keep pace with AI’s rapid development. The role of legal in enterprise AI is no longer just about managing risk; it must become an enabler of responsible AI adoption that drives business value while ensuring regulatory adherence.

The New AI-Driven Legal Landscape

Expanding Scope of Legal Responsibilities

AI is broadening the scope of legal departments beyond their traditional focus. Legal teams are no longer just reviewing contracts and ensuring regulatory compliance—they are now expected to provide guidance on AI ethics, liability concerns, and intellectual property (IP) rights for AI-generated content. As enterprises deploy AI models in decision-making processes, legal teams must anticipate potential legal ramifications, such as bias, accountability, and transparency requirements.

Navigating Regulatory Complexity

Regulatory scrutiny of AI is intensifying worldwide. Governments and regulatory bodies are introducing AI-specific laws, such as:

  • The EU AI Act, which categorizes AI systems based on risk levels and imposes strict compliance requirements on high-risk AI applications.

  • The U.S. AI Executive Order, which focuses on AI safety, ethics, and national security implications.

  • China’s AI Regulations, which mandate transparency, data security, and fairness in AI-driven applications.

Legal teams must stay ahead of these evolving regulations and ensure compliance in multi-jurisdictional environments. The challenge lies in balancing innovation with adherence to diverse legal frameworks.

Key Challenges for Legal in Enterprise AI

AI Governance & Compliance

Ensuring AI governance is one of the biggest challenges for legal teams. Enterprises must establish clear policies and guardrails to prevent AI from causing unintended harm. Key governance concerns include:

  • Bias and fairness: AI systems can inadvertently reinforce discriminatory practices if trained on biased datasets.

  • Transparency: Regulatory bodies require enterprises to explain AI-driven decisions, particularly in industries like finance and healthcare.

  • Model accountability: Legal teams must define accountability measures if AI-generated outputs lead to financial losses or reputational damage.

Data Privacy & Security Risks

AI models require vast amounts of data to function effectively, increasing the risk of privacy violations. Legal teams must address:

  • Compliance with data protection laws such as GDPR and CCPA, which mandate user consent and data protection measures.

  • AI-driven data processing risks, including unauthorized data access and potential breaches.

  • Third-party data usage in AI models, ensuring that data sourcing adheres to legal and ethical guidelines.

Liability & Accountability

One of the most pressing legal concerns in AI is determining liability. If an AI system generates incorrect financial advice or misinterprets legal documents, who is responsible? Enterprises must consider:

  • Legal attribution of AI decisions and whether AI should be treated as an entity in liability claims.

  • Contractual provisions that define vendor responsibility for AI-driven errors.

  • Industry-specific regulations, such as those governing AI-assisted medical diagnoses or autonomous driving systems.

Contracting for AI

AI contracts require a fundamental rethink. Unlike traditional software, AI systems continuously evolve, requiring dynamic contract structures. Legal teams must:

  • Develop AI-specific contract language that covers liability, compliance, and ethical considerations.

  • Establish clear accountability clauses for AI-generated outputs.

  • Address intellectual property ownership, particularly in cases where AI creates content, code, or proprietary insights.

How Legal Can Evolve into an AI-Forward Function

Embedding Legal in AI Development Lifecycles

Legal teams must move from a reactive to a proactive role in AI development. Instead of being consulted at the final stage of AI deployment, legal professionals should be embedded within AI development teams from the outset. This approach enables:

  • Early identification of legal risks before AI models go live.

  • Collaboration with AI engineers and data scientists to ensure compliance is built into AI systems.

  • Development of AI governance frameworks that align with both corporate strategy and legal requirements.

Shaping AI Governance Frameworks

Enterprises need structured AI governance models that integrate legal oversight. This includes:

  • Defining AI policies that establish ethical and regulatory boundaries.

  • Implementing risk assessment procedures to evaluate AI system reliability.

  • Aligning AI initiatives with corporate responsibility and sustainability goals.

Leveraging AI for Legal Operations

Legal departments can also harness AI to streamline their own workflows. AI-powered tools can assist with:

  • Contract analysis, reducing the time required for document review.

  • Automated compliance monitoring, ensuring adherence to evolving regulations.

  • AI-driven legal research, enhancing decision-making through rapid case law analysis.

Conclusion: The Legal Team as an AI Business Enabler

The legal function in enterprise AI must evolve beyond risk mitigation to become a strategic partner in AI-driven transformation. Legal teams that proactively engage with AI governance, compliance, and policy-setting will not only protect enterprises from regulatory risks but also drive responsible AI adoption.

By embracing AI as both a tool and a regulatory challenge, legal teams can position themselves as critical enablers of AI innovation. The future of enterprise AI depends not only on technical advancements but also on the ability of legal professionals to shape ethical, compliant, and strategically sound AI implementations.

Make AI work at work

Learn how Shieldbase AI can accelerate AI adoption with your own data.